In December 2012 the district court
decided that the woman, complaining about the 'quality' of her
pedigree, was right by claiming the dog breeder to be liable for
delivering a sick and inbred dog. The breeder was sentenced for
unfair business practices.
He claimed the medical faults in the
dog were not his doing, but the court felt the breeder should have
accepted that inbreeding does occur and he should have warned the
buyer for the possibility of bad health. In this specific case he
should have informed the buyer that this medical condition is
well-known for this dogs pedigree.
Then, however, the court states that
“A consumer of a relatively expensive pedigree dog must be able to
expect a healthy dog”. That error amuses me and makes me sad. Of
course any well thinking buyer should know: “Any consumer of a
relatively expensive pedigree dog must be able to expect an inbred
dog with built-in genetic faults”. Pedigree is a contradiction for
healthy dog.
We inform consumers about overbred
plopchickens (broiler chicks in English or 'plofkip' in Dutch is a
pedigree chick to grow very fast in a minimum of
time) but we do not teach them that breeders do the same to their
beloved pets (dogs, horses, pigeons...).
The Dutch Kennel Club Council has
even turned to a 'professional' spokesman to counter the offensive
they expect on pedigree breeding. As I do, they seem to fear that
people will call for a full halt on commercial pedigree breeding, but
I feel that pedigree breeding will help solving detail questions from
the theory of evolution.
So, please do not stop breeders from
breeding to the extreme. They are running an experiment that supports
evolutionary theory and could help to gain additional insights. Sorry
for the dogs though but you don't need a permit. And people will keep
buying pedigrees, just as they keep on acquiring guns, Hummers, rhino
horns, bleached blondes and fa(s)t food.
No comments:
Post a Comment