Darwin, DNA, the dodo and the digital depot

Sander Kooreman wrote a blog called Darwin, DNA, the dodo and the digital depot. In this article he lent some examples from evolutionary biology to make his points. This is the first in a series of examples I will blog about to show biology misconceptions.

On Bio and Scio

In 2011 I found, at last, the time to start writing some public comments on many subjects. I opened a blog on ICT and policy called NewtOnICT and Dutch-language one on teleworking and on the concept of the "New Way of Work", called TeleWerkWijzer.

But the feeling that all too many people have corrupted ideas on how Nature works keeps nagging. Time and again I proof-read university and business papers, on all kinds of subjects, where the author uses Nature as a concept, as a model. And these examples are almost always based on misconceptions on how the world of Biology works or even how Science in general operates.

So here I will take time to post my personal ideas on these matters, both as a source of fun and learning but also as a warning to take what people write about nature not too lightly. Nature is a bitch in keeping her secrets. Unlike superstitions, which are based on their own proof, Nature does not accept any proof. If anything, proof is the end result but never the beginning.

And ... the proof you rely on will in the end always show to be only a flimsy shadow of the real thing - thank you, Plato.